It was a transition stage for tamil cinema. Rajini was a budding hero with Bairavi, Shankar Saleem simon kind of films.

It was the time where in most of the new directors were experimenting.Bharathiraja wtih Kizhakke pogum rayil and Sigappu rojakkal, Rudrayya with Aval appadi thaan, KB with Nizhal nijamagiradhu. Mullum Malarum had came and broke all the rules that Tamil cinema had till that time. If Jayakanthan had written the story 'Agnipravesam' in 2009, it wouldnвЂ™t have created the same shock waves as it did in 1965. For any art, it is more essential to note the time it is shared to public. World cinema need not necessarily be an Iranian, Spanish, Chinese or a Japanese movie. For the comparison game, I vote the Hindi version. The film could ve been sold well in Kerala along with Lalettan and similarly in Telugu along with Venkatesh.I am not sure about the role of the director Sakri in this lion's feast. The same reason why Manirathnam has used Abhishek Bachan and Aishwarya for the story of Ambani - GURU. Why Kamal would want to do this film that too along with Mohan lal whereas the same could have been done with Prakasraj as the common man and Nasser as the commissioner - think about the saleability then. Tamil version has some jumps with missing flow and gives less importance to the other characters.Д¬oming to the business side of the movie. If you are able to keep the Hindi original aside, it's a fantastic effort. Those who follow journals can understand these kind of hypes or fights. The red camera work is as usual an advertising gimmick to add. Instead of introducing Shruthi with a music album, she has a got a film to get her debut. I couldn't find a great scope for dashing BGM in this film. Shruthi Hasan has done an average job in her area. The good thing is that they haven't used songs in this film too.

Aayutha ezhuthu string bgm